On December 2nd, I shared the video of Liz Gunn interviewing New Zealand database administrator turned whistleblower, “Winston Smith,” who we now know is a man named Barry Young. Pretty quickly, there were comments that the data presented by “Mr. Smith” might be problematic. Having not seen the data myself, and being very interested in and aware of, how easily data can be misrepresented, I took those concerns seriously. I edited my post to include a link to Igor Chudov’s analysis, which outlined some genuine issues. Chudov has since updated his information here, after further review of the data and concerns. In his update, Mr. Chudov states,
At this point, I believe that Barry Young was more likely to be sincere than insincere in his intentions and actions.
My previous questions and comments about Liz Gunn’s statements about nursing home deaths and data quality still apply, with one exception: the partial nature of the data is explained by the fact that some shots were not paid through the system that Barry Young was supposedly administering. (I hope more clarity emerges).
This clarification is vital since I questioned the sincerity of the person who possibly risked his life to disclose data.
Over the last few days, I have read additional Substack articles from Steve Kirsch and from Jeff Childers. I am grateful to my friend KC for directing me to these articles, and as this friend correctly noted, Jeff Childers ties everything together in an easy-to-follow report. Rather than attempting to recreate what has already been done so well, I encourage you to read his article, Lost in New Zealand, published on Sunday, December 3, 2023. From Jeff Childers’ article:
What Can We Conclude?
Firstly, New Zealand’s reporting about Barry Young’s arrest is peculiarly dubious. Compare Young’s arrest with Florida’s odious nutjob Rebekah Jones, who also claimed to be a health data whistleblower, and was also arrested, rightfully so. She is also a compulsive liar.
We can learn several things from the official reporting:
They don’t deny the ‘leaker’ is (was) a health system employee, confirming Young’s claims.
They insist — often and loudly — that he’s not a ‘vaccine expert,’ again consistent with Young’s claim to be an Oracle database administrator.
They do NOT claim that Young’s data is fake, altered, compromised, or misrepresented in any way. So we can assume the Young Data is legit.
Most tellingly, they allege Young was “spreading misinformation” but never described the alleged misinformation, not even a little. The closest they get is implying that Young generally accused the jabs of being unsafe, which is not a crime, even in New Zealand.
Finally, it’s unsurprising Young was arrested, since after all he did leak confidential information. But it is shocking how fast they arrested him. By comparison, it took about 18 months to arrest Rebekah Jones, and then only after Florida police actually conducted an investigation. Young’s turbo-arrest looks like a cover up.
Read the rest, here.
Thanks for sharing this, and reporting back in a timely fashion. The person in charge of all this data in NZ is certainly no fool, and knew he was taking considerable risk in exposing it.
great work, thank you Marcella.