Vax-Unvax: Let the Science Speak book summarizes the findings of over 100 papers published in the peer-reviewed scientific literature. The Studies the CDC Refuses to Do!
Overwhelming evidence shows how vaccinated people have far worse health outcomes than the unvaccinated. It also talks about the corruption at the CDC, FDA, and NIH and the stonewalling by the US government agencies to do the required studies that would expose the truth.
Here's a link to "Trojan horses and cluster bombs: aluminium and vaccines" from the "Official Channel of Dr Suzanne Humphries" (@drsuzanneh) on Odysee:
Thank you, Nick. I will add the link for Dr. Suzanne’s channel to the post. I found the video on Odysee - not on her channel, though. I appreciate you sharing it so I can direct people there.
Every disease which vaccines have been developed for would be less of a problem if everyone had sufficient 25-hydroxyvitamin D circulating in their bloodstream to supply their immune system properly. It is a disaster and a scandal that vaccines are recommended or mandated when much better protection could be achieved, with complete safety, by proper vitamin D3 supplementation. Furthermore, since vaccines achieve their benefits by stimulating the immune system, it follows that they well be more effective if the immune system is working properly.
Please read the research articles cited and discussed at: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/ . This includes a tutorial on 25-hydroxyvitamin D to calcitriol intracrine and paracrine signaling, which many types of immune cell rely upon in order to change their behaviour in response to their changing circumstances.
In most or all countries, most people have only a fraction of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D their immune system needs to function properly. The problems begin before birth: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/#3.2, with preeclampsia, pre-term birth and the later development of autism, ADHD, intellectual disability and schizophrenia.
Infectious diseases, cancer and auto-immune diseases are more prevalent, harmful and deadly than they would be if everyone had at least 50 ng/mL 25-hydroxyvitamin D. https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/#3.3 cites and discusses research concerning low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, which are common, greatly increasing the risk of neurodegeneration - Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies etc.
25-hydroxyvitamin D is produced, primarily in the liver, from vitamin D3 which is ingested or produced in the (ideally white) skin by ultraviolet-B irradiation, which breaks a carbon ring in 7-dehydrocholesterol. There is very little vitamin D3 in food, fortified or not. UV-B is not a suitable method of attaining most or all of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D we need to be healthy, since it is only naturally available, far from the equator, from high-elevation sunlight in summer, without intervening glass, sunscreen or clothing and because UV-B damages DNA and so raises the risk of skin cancer.
Neither vitamin D3 nor 25-hydroxyvitamin D function as hormones. 25-hydroxyvitamin D circulating in the bloodstream takes months to build up with healthy intakes of supplemental vitamin D3. "Vitamin D" blood tests measure the level (concentration) of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, which is not a vitamin.
Most people without proper vitamin D3 supplementation or recent extensive UV-B exposure (which is not very effective for those with brown or black skin) have 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in the 10 to 25 nanogram per millilitre range. Doctors regard this as normal, and most of them aim for at least 20 ng/mL, which is sufficient to enable the kidneys to play their role in regulating calcium-phosphate-bone metabolism. (The kidneys perform a second hydroxylation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D to produce calcitriol - 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D - at a very low level in the bloodstream, such as 0.05 ng/mL, where it functions as a hormone: a molecule in the bloodstream and/or cerebrospinal fluid which affects or controls the behaviour of cells far distant from the source of the substance.
In the UK, Australia, New Zealand and some other countries, the level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D is reported in nanomols per litre. Multiply the ng/mL figure by 2.5 to get the nmol/L value.
Most doctors and immunologists are not aware of this research. So if a patient's 25-hydroxyvitamin D level is, for instance, 50 ng/mL, which is just enough to supply their immune system properly, the doctor will consider them at risk of toxicity and so may advise them to cease or reduce vitamin D3 supplementation.
https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/#00-how-much has recommendations from New Jersey based Professor of Medicine, Sunil Wimalawansa, based on his 2021 article in Nutrients: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/14/14/2997, on how much vitamin D3 to supplement (according to body weight and obesity status) on order to safely attain at least the 50 ng/mL level of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D the immune system needs to function properly, without the need for blood tests or medical monitoring.
For average weight adults, this is about 0.125 milligrams = 5000 IU a day on average. This is a gram every 22 years. Pharma-grade vitamin D3 costs about USD$2.50 a gram ex-factory.
This takes several months to raise the 25-hydroxyvitamin D level safely over 50 ng/mL. So it is best to take more for a few weeks to accelerate the process when pregnant. (For clinical emergencies, such as Kawasaki disease, MIS-C, sepsis, COVID-19 etc. a bolus dose of vitamin D3, such as 10 mg 400,000 IU for a 70 kg 154 lb adult, can raise the level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in a few days. A single oral dose of 1 milligram of calcifediol (again for 70 kg BW), which *is* 25-hydroxyvitamin D, can attain this in 4 hours. See Prof. Wimalawansa's article and: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/#4.7.
The immune system does not use hormonal signaling. Many types of immune cell need a good level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in order to run their 25-hydroxyvitamin D to calcitriol intracrine (inside each cell) and paracrine (to nearby cells, typically of different types) signaling systems. These systems are activated, in an individual immune cell, by a cell-type specific condition. The resulting calcitriol changes the cell's behaviour in different ways for each cell type. Most doctors and immunologists have never heard of these signaling systems. There being no peer-reviewed journal tutorial on these, I wrote one in 2020: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/02-intracrine/.
The same intracrine and paracrine signaling systems are likely used by unknown number of cell types which are not involved in immunity or calcium-phosphate-bone metabolism, but which are known to have their gene expression altered by calcitriol. The effect of low in-utero 25-hydroxyvitamin D on autism and mental retardation indicates that some of these cell types are involved in embryonic (and probably all of life) neurodevelopment.
I am an electronic technician and computer programmer. Please do not take my word for any of this. I am writing to encourage people to read the research for themselves, just as Marcella does. It can be a lot of work, and it may be best to get the guidance of medical professionals *after* they have read the most pertinent research. Unfortunately, many or most doctors are not interested. They tend not to read research and prefer - or are required to - follow official guidelines, which for vitamin D3 supplementation are woefully inadequate and have long been disputed by the best informed clinicians and researchers: https://www.grassrootshealth.net/project/our-scientists/ and https://www.grassrootshealth.net/scientists-call-daction-public-health-2024/.
The safety and effectiveness of vaccines is, in general, very much overrated. Many people want to believe that they can be protected from contracting and transmitting infectious diseases by accepting a small injection of a genuinely safe and effective fluid which has been developed and tested over many years by experts with millions or billions of dollars in funding under the oversight of government agencies whose sole aim is to protect the health of the public. Yet corruption and groupthink is rife in medicine and the reality is very different.
Aaron Siri researched the vaccines (and Pfizer Comirnity modified messenger-RNA gene therapy injection for COVID-19 which is marketed as a vaccine) which the U.S. government recommends be administered to children and teenagers: https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/clinical-trials-of-childhood-vaccine . None of them have been tested with long-term placebo-controlled trial.
The most widely used vaccine (not counting the COVID-19 vaccines and gene-therapies falsely portrayed as vaccines) is for influenza. Each year a different vaccine is made, targeting the strains of the virus thought most likely to be prevalent in "flu season" which is winter-spring, when average 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are at their lowest.
While some people may take this vaccine in the belief that it reduces their chance of infecting others (and the research mentioned next does not preclude this occurring), the main reason for doing so is surely to protect against severe disease and death in the person who is vaccinated.
In 2020, Anderson et al. set out to detect this reduction in hospitalisation and death due to influenza, confident they would find a strong signal, using a research technique which has no confounding mechanisms: https://sci-hub.se/10.7326/M19-3075. They analysed huge datasets from England and Wales, covering 9.6 million patient years (vaccination rates by age), hospitalisation data and mortality statistics covering 7.6 million deaths. Due to a government campaign, the proportion of people accepting the influenza vaccine each year rises from 27% at age 64 to 57% at age 66. Yet risks of hospitalisation and death due to influenza or other respiratory diseases all rise smoothly with age. There is no decrease around age 65, when an additional 30% of the population adopted (generally) annual influenza vaccination. For a discussion of this and other robust research which shows that influenza vaccines do not reduce serious symptoms or death, please see: https://nutritionmatters.substack.com/p/influenza-vaccines-do-not-reduce and the second article linked to from there.
It is so sad to know that this information is not distributed to pregnant woman as a matter of course (by the medical fraternity) It can only be found by those who know something is wrong and are actively looking for the truth 😕 thank you for your work- an amazingly thorough article that I will TRY to get my son to read …. Unfortunately, the vax beliefs he holds are truly strong and I have yet to make any sort of dent in them no matter what evidence I present….
Vax-Unvax: Let the Science Speak book summarizes the findings of over 100 papers published in the peer-reviewed scientific literature. The Studies the CDC Refuses to Do!
Overwhelming evidence shows how vaccinated people have far worse health outcomes than the unvaccinated. It also talks about the corruption at the CDC, FDA, and NIH and the stonewalling by the US government agencies to do the required studies that would expose the truth.
The fact that the CDC, FDA, and NIH resist doing these studies, to this day, speaks volumes.. https://www.amazon.com/Vax-Unvax-Childrens-Health-Defense-Kennedy/dp/1510766960
Sarah Wickham has very well researched, logical articles on homebirth safety and real info about RhoGam and Strep B (where they coerce AMERICAN moms into testing for and taking antibiotics for something whose presence can change from week to week. https://www.sarawickham.com/riffing-ranting-and-raving/how-to-save-40000-women-a-year-from-having-an-unnecessary-blood-product/
I wish I had this information about
RhoGam jabs in 1997. I received 8 jabs for my 4 pregnancies. I was definitely injured. I was always sick and had debilitating migraine headaches ☹️🤬
Here's a link to "Trojan horses and cluster bombs: aluminium and vaccines" from the "Official Channel of Dr Suzanne Humphries" (@drsuzanneh) on Odysee:
https://odysee.com/@drsuzanneh:f/Trojan-Horses-and-Clusterbombs-Dr-Suzanne-Humphries-on-alumi:a
Thank you, Nick. I will add the link for Dr. Suzanne’s channel to the post. I found the video on Odysee - not on her channel, though. I appreciate you sharing it so I can direct people there.
Thanks Marcella! You could consider linking to this page as well?
https://dissolvingillusions.com/graphs-images/
Done!
Every disease which vaccines have been developed for would be less of a problem if everyone had sufficient 25-hydroxyvitamin D circulating in their bloodstream to supply their immune system properly. It is a disaster and a scandal that vaccines are recommended or mandated when much better protection could be achieved, with complete safety, by proper vitamin D3 supplementation. Furthermore, since vaccines achieve their benefits by stimulating the immune system, it follows that they well be more effective if the immune system is working properly.
Please read the research articles cited and discussed at: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/ . This includes a tutorial on 25-hydroxyvitamin D to calcitriol intracrine and paracrine signaling, which many types of immune cell rely upon in order to change their behaviour in response to their changing circumstances.
In most or all countries, most people have only a fraction of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D their immune system needs to function properly. The problems begin before birth: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/#3.2, with preeclampsia, pre-term birth and the later development of autism, ADHD, intellectual disability and schizophrenia.
Infectious diseases, cancer and auto-immune diseases are more prevalent, harmful and deadly than they would be if everyone had at least 50 ng/mL 25-hydroxyvitamin D. https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/#3.3 cites and discusses research concerning low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, which are common, greatly increasing the risk of neurodegeneration - Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies etc.
25-hydroxyvitamin D is produced, primarily in the liver, from vitamin D3 which is ingested or produced in the (ideally white) skin by ultraviolet-B irradiation, which breaks a carbon ring in 7-dehydrocholesterol. There is very little vitamin D3 in food, fortified or not. UV-B is not a suitable method of attaining most or all of the 25-hydroxyvitamin D we need to be healthy, since it is only naturally available, far from the equator, from high-elevation sunlight in summer, without intervening glass, sunscreen or clothing and because UV-B damages DNA and so raises the risk of skin cancer.
Neither vitamin D3 nor 25-hydroxyvitamin D function as hormones. 25-hydroxyvitamin D circulating in the bloodstream takes months to build up with healthy intakes of supplemental vitamin D3. "Vitamin D" blood tests measure the level (concentration) of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, which is not a vitamin.
Most people without proper vitamin D3 supplementation or recent extensive UV-B exposure (which is not very effective for those with brown or black skin) have 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in the 10 to 25 nanogram per millilitre range. Doctors regard this as normal, and most of them aim for at least 20 ng/mL, which is sufficient to enable the kidneys to play their role in regulating calcium-phosphate-bone metabolism. (The kidneys perform a second hydroxylation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D to produce calcitriol - 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D - at a very low level in the bloodstream, such as 0.05 ng/mL, where it functions as a hormone: a molecule in the bloodstream and/or cerebrospinal fluid which affects or controls the behaviour of cells far distant from the source of the substance.
In the UK, Australia, New Zealand and some other countries, the level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D is reported in nanomols per litre. Multiply the ng/mL figure by 2.5 to get the nmol/L value.
Typical reference ranges supplied with the results of 25-hydroxyvitamin D blood tests are 20 to 40 ng/mL (50 to 100 nmol/L). Yet research shows clearly that the immune system needs at least 50 ng/mL (125 nmol/L = 1 part in 20,000,000 by mass) to function properly: Quraishi et al. 2014 https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamasurgery/fullarticle/1782085 - and their graphs combined: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/#00-50ngmL.
Most doctors and immunologists are not aware of this research. So if a patient's 25-hydroxyvitamin D level is, for instance, 50 ng/mL, which is just enough to supply their immune system properly, the doctor will consider them at risk of toxicity and so may advise them to cease or reduce vitamin D3 supplementation.
https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/#00-how-much has recommendations from New Jersey based Professor of Medicine, Sunil Wimalawansa, based on his 2021 article in Nutrients: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/14/14/2997, on how much vitamin D3 to supplement (according to body weight and obesity status) on order to safely attain at least the 50 ng/mL level of circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D the immune system needs to function properly, without the need for blood tests or medical monitoring.
For average weight adults, this is about 0.125 milligrams = 5000 IU a day on average. This is a gram every 22 years. Pharma-grade vitamin D3 costs about USD$2.50 a gram ex-factory.
This takes several months to raise the 25-hydroxyvitamin D level safely over 50 ng/mL. So it is best to take more for a few weeks to accelerate the process when pregnant. (For clinical emergencies, such as Kawasaki disease, MIS-C, sepsis, COVID-19 etc. a bolus dose of vitamin D3, such as 10 mg 400,000 IU for a 70 kg 154 lb adult, can raise the level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in a few days. A single oral dose of 1 milligram of calcifediol (again for 70 kg BW), which *is* 25-hydroxyvitamin D, can attain this in 4 hours. See Prof. Wimalawansa's article and: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/#4.7.
The immune system does not use hormonal signaling. Many types of immune cell need a good level of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in order to run their 25-hydroxyvitamin D to calcitriol intracrine (inside each cell) and paracrine (to nearby cells, typically of different types) signaling systems. These systems are activated, in an individual immune cell, by a cell-type specific condition. The resulting calcitriol changes the cell's behaviour in different ways for each cell type. Most doctors and immunologists have never heard of these signaling systems. There being no peer-reviewed journal tutorial on these, I wrote one in 2020: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/02-intracrine/.
The same intracrine and paracrine signaling systems are likely used by unknown number of cell types which are not involved in immunity or calcium-phosphate-bone metabolism, but which are known to have their gene expression altered by calcitriol. The effect of low in-utero 25-hydroxyvitamin D on autism and mental retardation indicates that some of these cell types are involved in embryonic (and probably all of life) neurodevelopment.
I am an electronic technician and computer programmer. Please do not take my word for any of this. I am writing to encourage people to read the research for themselves, just as Marcella does. It can be a lot of work, and it may be best to get the guidance of medical professionals *after* they have read the most pertinent research. Unfortunately, many or most doctors are not interested. They tend not to read research and prefer - or are required to - follow official guidelines, which for vitamin D3 supplementation are woefully inadequate and have long been disputed by the best informed clinicians and researchers: https://www.grassrootshealth.net/project/our-scientists/ and https://www.grassrootshealth.net/scientists-call-daction-public-health-2024/.
The safety and effectiveness of vaccines is, in general, very much overrated. Many people want to believe that they can be protected from contracting and transmitting infectious diseases by accepting a small injection of a genuinely safe and effective fluid which has been developed and tested over many years by experts with millions or billions of dollars in funding under the oversight of government agencies whose sole aim is to protect the health of the public. Yet corruption and groupthink is rife in medicine and the reality is very different.
Aaron Siri researched the vaccines (and Pfizer Comirnity modified messenger-RNA gene therapy injection for COVID-19 which is marketed as a vaccine) which the U.S. government recommends be administered to children and teenagers: https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/clinical-trials-of-childhood-vaccine . None of them have been tested with long-term placebo-controlled trial.
The most widely used vaccine (not counting the COVID-19 vaccines and gene-therapies falsely portrayed as vaccines) is for influenza. Each year a different vaccine is made, targeting the strains of the virus thought most likely to be prevalent in "flu season" which is winter-spring, when average 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are at their lowest.
While some people may take this vaccine in the belief that it reduces their chance of infecting others (and the research mentioned next does not preclude this occurring), the main reason for doing so is surely to protect against severe disease and death in the person who is vaccinated.
In 2020, Anderson et al. set out to detect this reduction in hospitalisation and death due to influenza, confident they would find a strong signal, using a research technique which has no confounding mechanisms: https://sci-hub.se/10.7326/M19-3075. They analysed huge datasets from England and Wales, covering 9.6 million patient years (vaccination rates by age), hospitalisation data and mortality statistics covering 7.6 million deaths. Due to a government campaign, the proportion of people accepting the influenza vaccine each year rises from 27% at age 64 to 57% at age 66. Yet risks of hospitalisation and death due to influenza or other respiratory diseases all rise smoothly with age. There is no decrease around age 65, when an additional 30% of the population adopted (generally) annual influenza vaccination. For a discussion of this and other robust research which shows that influenza vaccines do not reduce serious symptoms or death, please see: https://nutritionmatters.substack.com/p/influenza-vaccines-do-not-reduce and the second article linked to from there.
Great comment. Thank you!
This is wonderful. Thank you so much. I have several family members that I’d like to awaken. 🙏🏼
It is so sad to know that this information is not distributed to pregnant woman as a matter of course (by the medical fraternity) It can only be found by those who know something is wrong and are actively looking for the truth 😕 thank you for your work- an amazingly thorough article that I will TRY to get my son to read …. Unfortunately, the vax beliefs he holds are truly strong and I have yet to make any sort of dent in them no matter what evidence I present….
You are so not alone. Sad to say. ❤️🙏
Thank you, Marcella, for reposting and updating everything. Sharing everywhere!